IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Subject prefixes
- Subject prefixes
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets-05.txt> (Deprecation of the use of BGP AS_SET, AS_CONFED_SET.) to Informational RFC
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?
- Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration
- Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-lisp-lig-04.txt>
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming
- Re: The fallacy of perfection
- Re: [pim] tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-pim-mtid-08
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: The fallacy of perfection (Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email)
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: The fallacy of perfection (Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email)
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>
- Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- The fallacy of perfection (Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email)
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- RE: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt>(Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- You need to be aware that US Patent Laws have evolved and intentionally violating them is actionable no matter what the IETF tells you...
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- RE: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- RE: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- RE: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt>(Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- From: GT RAMIREZ, Medel G.
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-ion-report-06.txt> (Report on the Experiment with IETF Operational Notes (IONs)) to Informational RFC
- RE: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC
- Queen Sirikit National Convention Center
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Is BIOS in the IETF scope?
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: happiana -- IETF/W3C/IANA Registry Happiness
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: Opening BCP 79 (was: Re: encouraging compliance with IPR disclosure rules)
- I-D Working groups and mailing list
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update
- RE: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: happiana -- IETF/W3C/IANA Registry Happiness
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: happiana -- IETF/W3C/IANA Registry Happiness
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-00.txt> (Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- RE: "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule]
- RE: "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule]
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Languages, idiom, reference, subtext, ...
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule]
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 39, Issue 13
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Call for Nominations: Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) for IETF-82
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- RE: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Secdir review of draft-doria-genart-experience-04
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule]
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- is IETF trying to do too much?
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Minutes for IETF 81 Administrative Plenary
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Drafts Submissions cut-off
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Review of: draft-ietf-iab-draft-iab-dns-applications-02
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: A modest proposal...
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- secdir review of draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update
- Re: A modest proposal...
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: RFC 6302: "Internet-Facing Server Logging": No Word about Privacy?
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- RE: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- From: Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri)
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Nathaniel Borenstein
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:
- tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-karp-threats-reqs-03
- Re: IAOC: delegating ex-officio responsibility
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:
- RE: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Gen-ART last call review of draft-yevstifeyev-ion-report-06
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: What is Native IPv6
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- RE: What is Native IPv6
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: What is Native IPv6
- Re: What is Native IPv6
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: What is Native IPv6
- Re: What is Native IPv6
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- What is Native IPv6
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- RE: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- RE: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- RE: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: On attending BoFs
- RE: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: [v6ops] Make 6to4 Experimental (was6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?)
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-00.txt> (Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:
- Re: On attending BoFs
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt>
- RE: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: On attending BoFs
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- RE: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt>
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt>
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: Kevin's second byte question
- Re: On attending BoFs
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: Kevin's second byte question
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: On attending BoFs
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: On attending BoFs
- Re: On attending BoFs
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- RE: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: Kevin's second byte question
- RE: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: On attending BoFs
- Re: On attending BoFs
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- RE: On attending BoFs
- On attending BoFs
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Kevin's second byte question
- Re: Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- RE: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: Standards and patents
- Re: Standards and patents
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: IPv6 PCP demo in room 2000 D
- RE: IPv6 traffic distribution
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Concerns about the recent IPR Statement from Alcatel Lucent Related to RFC 6073
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- RE: Kevin's second byte question
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- RE: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: IPv6 traffic distribution
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- IPv6 traffic distribution
- RE: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- From: GT RAMIREZ, Medel G.
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt>
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Plenary recordings available
- From: Meetecho IETF support
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- From: Simon Pietro Romano
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt>
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Re: [IPsec] Last Call: <draft-kivinen-ipsecme-secure-password-framework-01.txt> (Secure Password Framework for IKEv2) to Informational RFC
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Why the IESG needs to review everything...
- Kevin's second byte question
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- draft-housley-two-maturity-levels
- Re: Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Reminder: Remote Participation Support for Admin Plenary Tonight
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- RE: RFC 6302: "Internet-Facing Server Logging": No Word about Privacy?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- RFC 6302: "Internet-Facing Server Logging": No Word about Privacy?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Additional registries converted to XML and announcement of new registry for Service Names and Port Numbers
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Nomcom 2011-2012: Final list of Nomcom members
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: RE: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- RE: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: slide numbers
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- slide numbers
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: Standards and patents
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Standards and patents
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- From: GT RAMIREZ, Medel G.
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04
- Re: 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)? (was: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again))
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [mile] MILE side meeting, IETF81 in Quebec, Monday night July 25th
- [irsg] Final Agenda: IRTF Open Meeting at IETF-81
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- RE: Review of: draft-ietf-iab-draft-iab-dns-applications-02
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: IAOC: delegating ex-officio responsibility
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: IAOC: delegating ex-officio responsibility
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04
- re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- RE: IPv6 Advanced Socket API and POSIX
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- IPv6 Advanced Socket API and POSIX
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again)
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]