Re: Anotherj RFP without IETF community input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/2011 03:02 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:

On Oct 20, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

One thing to consider is charging for this service

I have no problem paying some fee to the IETF in order to get better remote participation capability when I am unable to travel to the location chosen.

I would much rather pay $200-$300 to have good remote attendance capability (video etc.) than get by on 'free'.

This would be assuming that there would be some markup on the remote attendance cost to finance the secretariat etc.

I disagree. If the remote participation service is high quality, it should require the same registration fee structure as on-site participation.

Why? Presumably a significant portion of the registration fee goes to pay the venue for use of its space, for food and beverages, and other costs that remote participants don't incur.

--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | SIP: kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]