Re: meeting slots

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Dave" == Dave CROCKER <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    >> It would also be good to expose the conflict lists that the
    >> chairs have provided ahead of time, so that WG participants can
    >> point out (hopefully to the chairs) potential conflicts that the
    >> chairs may have omitted.


    Dave> While this sounds intuitively very appealing, it seems likely
    Dave> to set an expectation that the folks trying to schedule
    Dave> meeting times will juggle the conflicts of all attendees.
    Dave> That doesn't sound like something that can scale. (My
    Dave> impression is that the current scale of the task is at a
    Dave> limit.)

If it reduces the demand for meeting slots, because a chair realizes
that nobody is coming to their WG, due to a conflict, then that's good
news.

We have too many slots.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]