--On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:11 -0700 Dave CROCKER <dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/12/2011 10:27 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote: >> I was not picturing everyone adding their own conflicts. >> However, I thought this might help us avoid some of the >> issues we've had in the past, where obvious group-level >> conflicts are omitted, and meetings have to be rescheduled at >> the last moments. > > I'll suggest a more distributed model: > > Chairs circulate among their wg, the conflicts they believe > should be avoided. When that discussion settles down, the > chairs submit their set to ietf staff. IETF staff and ietf > main list are thereby spared the effort, but each set gets > review beyond the chairs. Of course, some WGs / Chairs have been doing this, or variations on it. for some years now. I'd venture that it works better in some WGs than others... much like many other things. john _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf