Re: Requirement to go to meetings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nothing happens without deadlines. I'd be more in favor of going back
to 4 meetings a year than going to 2...

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/25/11 3:48 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
>>
>>
>> --On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 10:19 -0700 Fred Baker
>> <fred@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Ping Pan wrote:
>>>
>>>>  the original issue remains: please make IETF meetings easier
>>>>  and cheaper for us to go to. ;-)
>>>
>>> I think that a lot of people would like that. There are a
>>> number of problems that need to be solved to make them cheaper
>>> to attend.
>>>
>>> One is the issue of air fare and hotel cost; these have been
>>> brought up before. 25 years ago, all meetings were in the US,
>>> as were most of the participants. People came from Europe and
>>> Australia at significantly greater cost, but for the average
>>> attendee, putting all meetings in the US reduced meeting cost.
>>> It's now 25 years later, and that logic doesn't remotely start
>>> to work.
>>> ...
>>
>> Ok, Fred, let me enter one suggestion into this discussion that
>> would actually cut total costs, recognize and take advantage of
>> the observation that an increasing number of WGs are holding
>> virtual interim meetings, and reduce pressures on meeting time
>> conflicts and trying to get everything done in 4 3/4 days.
>>
>> Eliminate one of the face to face meetings entirely -- go to two
>> a year and either hold the 4 3/4 day schedule or, better cut it
>> back to four.
>
> Reducing the number of meetings a year from three to two makes sense.
> Naturally, we'd need to work through the implications (e.g., the NomCom
> schedule is defined in terms of three meetings a year).
>
> Plus, it's a natural complement to having reduced the number of maturity
> levels from three to two. ;-)
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]