>>>>> "sm" == sm <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
sm> If you do not go to meetings, it's unlikely that you will be able to follow
sm> the BoF you are interested in. There may be times when decisions are taken
sm> during a meeting. It is not worth the nit-picking if the outcome won't
sm> change.
If you are claiming that remote participation for BOFs is more
challenging, then I *strongly* agree.
Much of the problem is not technical, but administrative (agendas and
materials being incomplete), and also proceedural (many many more
cross-microphone discussions, etc.)
The biggest challenge is however that we are seeing a massive increase
in "Bar-BOFs"... it's one thing if 5 people get together to figure out a
problem statement, it's another when it's announced...
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf