On 10/26/11 1:47 PM, Fred Baker wrote:Sure, we just set up a (two-tier?) membership structure and have all the
>
> On Oct 26, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> (e.g., the NomCom
>> schedule is defined in terms of three meetings a year).
>
> no problem. We stop having the nomcom.
members vote. Easy.
[MB] You don't need a membership structure to have voting - you just allow anyone that has attended the requisite number of meetings per the Nomcom process to vote - i.e., if you are qualified to be a voting member of the Nomcom, you can vote. I personally believe that voting would be better than the current model. As it is, a very small percentage of the participants actually contribute to the process in the form of nominating or providing feedback:
So, making it easier to provide input in the form of a vote might actually get more folks caring about who the leaders are. It would also save a tremendous amount of work on the part of the folks that serve on the Nomcom. [/MB]
[Also, ducking]
Mary.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf