Re: Requirement to go to meetings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/26/11 1:47 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> On Oct 26, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>
>> (e.g., the NomCom
>> schedule is defined in terms of three meetings a year).
>
> no problem. We stop having the nomcom.

Sure, we just set up a (two-tier?) membership structure and have all the
members vote. Easy.

[MB] You don't need a membership structure to have voting - you just allow anyone that has attended the requisite number of meetings per the Nomcom process to vote - i.e., if you are qualified to be a voting member of the Nomcom, you can vote.    I personally believe that voting would be better than the current model.  As it is, a very small percentage of the participants actually contribute to the process in the form of nominating or providing feedback:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-nomcom-report-2009-00 (section 6.2)

So, making it easier to provide input in the form of a vote might actually get more folks caring about who the leaders are.    It would also save a tremendous amount of work on the part of the folks that serve on the Nomcom.  [/MB]

[Also, ducking]

Mary. 

 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]