Re: DKIM delays

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alessandro:

>> Thus to the mpls list, the mail travels at the speed of light
>> 
>> Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
>> (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9417311E80A5; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
>> <snip>
>> X-Original-To: mpls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Delivered-To: mpls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
>> with ESMTP id 5F60B11E8098; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
>> 
>> whereas to the ietf list, it is delayed by the best part of a day.
>> 
>> Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
>> (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B1B21F8C11; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
>> <snip>
>> X-Original-To: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Delivered-To: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
>> with ESMTP id 5F60B11E8098; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> I can see the latter snippet features a very long delay.  However,
> you snipped those signatures one field too soon.  From the header
> of the message you wrote I get
> 
> Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A1F21F8AFD;
> 	Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
> 	t=1319184872; <snip>
> X-Original-To: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Delivered-To: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> 	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCD921F85B5
> 	for <ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> This is only a few seconds delay, but applying epoch logic, i.e.,
> 0x4ea129e8 = 1319184872 = 2011-10-21T01:14:32+07:00, I can see DKIM
> contribution.  IIRC, opendkim gets the time(&now) for that timestamp
> at end-of-header, before beginning to compute the body hash.

The long delays are not due to DKIM.  These happen when a message to a mail list gets held for moderation.

Russ
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]