Re: Last Call: <draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02.txt> (Complaint Feedback Loop Operational Recommendations) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>I'd still prefer s/the largest/a/ or s/the largest/a large/ or similar.

This makes no sense. you believe that there is another large
organization that does what MAAWG does?

>Others asked about the "non-derivative" blurb, and maybe I missed the
>answer for these questions.  What is the idea?

That's the normal language for for RFCs that reproduce other
organizations' documents.  There's nothing unusual about it.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]