----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@xxxxxxx>; "Frank Ellermann"
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "IETF Discussion" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:56 PM
> Randy,
>
> Reclassifying old documents to historic is like cleaning your attic. Cleaning
the attic may seem like a terrible waste of time and effort while you are doing
it, but it makes your life much easier the next time you have to find or store
something up there.
>
> Ron
Ron,
Given the time that has elapsed since this list last discussed Historicising, I
had almost forgotten that I read the message below; that seemed a good statement
then and seems a good one now.
"Folks,
After reading responses from Scott, John and Keith, I think that I get it. No
matter how low hanging I believe the fruit to be, this isn't going to be cheap
or easy. So, I withdraw the proposal and apologize to Mykyta for having wasted
his time.
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: t.petch [mailto:daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:24 AM
> To: Cyrus Daboo
> Cc: IETF Discussion; Keith Moore; Ronald Bonica
> Subject: Re: Pre-IETF RFCs to Historic (not really proposing)
"
======================================================
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > Randy Bush
> > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 2:47 PM
> > To: Frank Ellermann
> > Cc: IETF Discussion
> > Subject: Re: Last Calls: [SOME RFCs] to HISTORIC RFCs
> >
> > >> we don't have enough real work to do?
> > >
> > > Clean up is necessary work. Some hours ago
> > > I tried to understand a discussion about the
> > > "ISE" (independent stream), and gave up on
> > > it when the maze of updates obsoleting RFCs
> > > which updated other RFCs turned out to be
> > > as complex as the colossal cave adventure.
> >
> > QED
> >
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf