Re: Anotherj RFP without IETF community input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/2011 02:21 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
One thing to consider is charging for this service

I have no problem paying some fee to the IETF in order to get better
remote participation capability when I am unable to travel to the
location chosen.

I would much rather pay $200-$300 to have good remote attendance
capability (video etc.) than get by on 'free'.

I would also be onboard with paying a reasonable (USD200) fee to have high-quality remote participation available. The free options should still exist, but they can continue to be 'best-effort' services.

--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | SIP: kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]