On 05/Oct/11 20:22, SM wrote: > The Abstract mentions that: > > "While not originally written as an Internet Draft, it has been > contributed to the IETF standards repository in order to make it > easier to incorporate this material into IETF work." > > The "no derivative" clause makes it impossible to incorporate the > material in this draft in any IETF work. The restriction is not > called out correctly in draft-jdfalk-maawg-cfblbcp-02. IANAL, but my understanding is that one will be able to cite MAAWG's RFC in other works, thereby /using/ those statements without actually incorporating protected material literally. Copyright should protect the wording, not the technique. Taking up terminology and quoting small snippets of text should be fair use: J.D. himself, wearing a IETF hat, is drafting a Standard Track I-D (marf-as) that uses the CFBL BCP that way. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf