Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-rfc5335bis-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/11 6:59 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
But even if it is a typo, the text makes no sense. It says:

   Section 2.1.1 of [RFC5322] limits lines to 998 characters and
   recommends that the lines be restricted to only 78 characters.  This
   specification changes the former limit to 988 octets.

So, if the limit is still 998, then there is no change with respect the former limit.

See the next sentence:

   (Note that in
   ASCII octets and characters are effectively the same but this is not
   true in UTF-8.)

Remember, in UTF-8, characters can be multiple octets. So 998 UTF-8 encoded *characters* are likely to be many more than 998 octets long. So the change is to say that the limit is in octets, not in characters.

pr

--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]