Re: Requirement to go to meetings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

Donald

On Friday, October 28, 2011, Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct 2011, at 12:03, Richard Kulawiec wrote:
>
>> I support this concept, although I would go much further and
>> eliminate ALL face-to-face meetings.
>
> I absolutely wouldn't.
>
>> Travel (for meetings) is expensive, time-consuming, energy-inefficient,
>> and increasingly difficult.
>
> Your assertions above are all true, but that does not mean that people should be denied the opportunity to meet.
>
> Being mostly social animals, I believe it's essential that we *do* get to actually meet our IETF colleagues.
>
> Do not underestimate how important it is to actually establish a rapport with other people, and that can really only be achieved face-to-face.  This is simple psychology.  You simply can't get to know people and work with them effectively if all they are is faceless email accounts or a voice on a crowded conf call.
>
> I've met loads of people at my four years of IETF, and many of those I now consider friends.  I know what their competences are, and I know which ones I trust and distrust.  You just don't get that from remote participation.
>
> Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>

--
Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]