Hi John, Just responding to one specific concern (No. 3) you raised. I do believe that the other 3 (Nos. 1, 2 and 4) require process changes that cannot take place during the current nomcom cycle. On 11-10-27 11:25 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > ...snipped... > (3) I don't believe it has happened this year, but trends in the > community predict that, sooner or later, we will have someone > volunteer for a large number of positions simply because he or > she (or whomever they work for) wants them in the IETF > leadership. Someone ought to be able to write one comment that > says "Goofy wants to be in the leadership to enhance his resume > and told several of us that at a Bar BOF and should not be > selected for _any_ position. If you don't believe me alone, > check with X, Y, or Z." In the current model, that would > require writing a separate review for each position. Lots of > make-work; might not happen at all. But a Nomcom would really > want that input I think. You can already do this today. Just enter your feedback about the nominee into *any* one of the positions and state that it is for all the positions. The tool does not handle this case, but the humans behind certainly do. Thanks Suresh _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf