RE: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06.txt> (Dual Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hui Deng [mailto:denghui02@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 2:52 AM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: teemu.savolainen@xxxxxxxxx; satoru.matsushima@xxxxxxxxx;
> ietf@xxxxxxxx; softwires@xxxxxxxx; behave@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06.txt>
> (Dual Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)) to Proposed Standard
> 
> inline please,
> 
> 
> 2011/9/27 Dan Wing <dwing@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 	> -----Original Message-----
> 	> From: teemu.savolainen@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:teemu.savolainen@xxxxxxxxx]
> 	> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 11:14 PM
> 	> To: dwing@xxxxxxxxx; satoru.matsushima@xxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> 	> Cc: softwires@xxxxxxxx; behave@xxxxxxxx
> 	> Subject: RE: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-
> 06.txt>
> 	> (Dual Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)) to Proposed
> Standard
> 	>
> 
> 	> > I believe the objection is against "non-deterministic
> translation",
> 	> rather
> 	> than
> 	> > stateful versus stateless.  By non-deterministic, I mean that
> the
> 	> subscriber's
> 	> > equipment (e.g., CPE) cannot determine the mapping it will
> have on
> 	> the
> 	> > Internet.  A+P mechanisms are deterministic (including 4rd,
> Dual-IVI,
> 	> and
> 	> > draft-ymbk-aplus-p).
> 	> >
> 	> > A stateful CGN, as commonly deployed, is not deterministic.
> 	>
> 	> I don't understand why that is significant enough factor for
> IETF to
> 	> (not)
> 	> recommend some double translation variants. I mean does
> existing
> 	> applications work better if double translation is done in
> deterministic
> 	> manner?
> 
> 
> 	Yes, it allows the CPE to implement an ALG -- if an application
> needs
> 	an ALG (e.g., active-mode FTP).
> 
> 
> 
> Are you saying distrbiuted ALG is much better than centralized ALG?

Best is no ALG.  Worse is one ALG.  Even worse is two ALGs.

-d

> -Hui
> 
> 
> 
> 	-d
> 
> 
> 	> One reasoning against double translation has been that it
> 	> breaks
> 	> some class of applications. Is it now so that some forms of
> double
> 	> translation do not break applications while some others do?
> 	>
> 	>       Teemu
> 	>
> 
> 
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	Behave mailing list
> 	Behave@xxxxxxxx
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]