Re: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (TheReasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) toInformational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (TheReasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) toInformational RFC
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:01:49 +0100
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <007501cc8342$1ed5a5a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Reply-to: stbryant@xxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1


Tom

"I would take issue with OSPF/ISIS and IPv4/IPv6. "

Please can you expand a little on this.

Stewart


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt>(TheReasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM)toInformational RFC
  - From: t.petch

References:
- Re: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (TheReasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) toInformational RFC
  - From: t.petch

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]