Re: [mpls] R: FW: LastCall: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt>(The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




3) The global wide application of Ethernet services requires that the operator’s network must support Y.1731 Ethernet OAM, to guaranteeing the SLA for customers. Although many operators had expressed their requirements for MPLS-TP OAM using draft-bhh/G.8113.1 in IETF meetings and mail-list, but these were always been ignored.
The IETF is concerned with the design of an MPLS technology, not an Ethernet technology. What technical problem exists with the IETF OAM solution that prevents the operator from "guaranteeing the SLA for customers"?

Stewart
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]