RE: [mpls] R: FW: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As do I

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> David Sinicrope
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 7:11 PM
> To: David Allan I
> Cc: mpls@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [mpls] R: FW: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-
> considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for
> MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC
> 
> I concur with Dave's comment and support publication of the draft.
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 5, 2011, at 7:06 PM, "David Allan I"
> <david.i.allan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I think it is unfortunate that we are in a situation where such a
> document has utility. But ultimately it does.
> >
> > Therefore I support the publication of draft-sprecher...
> >
> > D
> >
> >
> >
> >> MPLS Working Group,
> >>
> >> Please be aware of the IETF last call as shown below. The document
> was
> >> presented for publication as an individual RFC with IETF consensus
> and
> >> AD sponsorship.
> >>
> >> This draft is clearly close and relevant to the work you do, but
> after
> >> discussing with the chairs I came to the conclusion that it does not
> >> comment on the technical or process decisions of the MPLS working
> >> groups, and it does not attempt to make any technical evaluations or
> >> definitions within the scope of the MPLS working group. It is more
> of
> >> a philosophical analysis of the way the IETF approaches the "two
> >> solutions" problem with special reference to MPLS-TP OAM.
> >>
> >> Thus, I am accepting the document as AD Sponsored rather than
> running
> >> it through the MPLS working group. My reasoning is that the working
> >> group has got plenty to do working on technical issues without being
> >> diverted into wider IETF philosophy.
> >>
> >> As an AD Sponsored I-D it is subject to a four week IETF last call.
> >> That is plenty of opportunity for everyone to comment and express
> >> their views. Please send your comments to the IETF mailing list as
> >> described below, or (in exceptional circumstances) direct to the
> IESG.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Adrian
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@xxxxxxxx
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]