On 10/27/2011 02:04 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
More generally, I wish we would just stop using names for WGs that are widely understood to mean something else in computer science, software engineering, or networking.
Yes, and the car/cdr jokes were funny once-each. That said, at this point the LISP protocol stuff has been around a bunch of years and changing its name would probably be more confusing than not changing its name. I'm not sure it's a good idea to change this one but I think it's an excellent idea to be more mindful in the future. [not buying the "'LISP' as homage" stuff. Someone thought it was funny. I can think of exactly one protocol that, for example, uses S-expressions, the sort of thing which would seem to show some actual regard for the work] Melinda _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf