ITU-T Beijing meeting [Was: Re: Last Call: <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yuxia wrote:

> I also agree with Huub. 
>
> As a consensus reached in Beijing meeting, mechanism using the tools defined
> for MPLS is a default tool set and another using the tools defined in
G.8013/Y.1731
> is an optional one. 

That is a an interesting and helpful statement. Obviously, most IETF
participants were not present at this meeting: is there a possibility that this
message could be communicated to the IETF in a more official way?

Thanks,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]