Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level-05.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Lennox wrote:

Hi, Alexey -- thank you for the Gen-ART review.
Hi Jonathan,

Alexey Melnikov writes:
Question: are the two encoding of the audio level indication option specified in the document really necessary?

Do you mean the one-byte vs. two-byte forms of the header extension (Figure 1 vs. Figure 2)?  These are the two forms of the generic header extensions defined by RFC 5285.

I understood that. Does RFC 5285 require that both forms should be allowed?
In general, it would be good to avoid multiple representations of the same thing.

The actual payload (one byte containing the V and level bits) is identical in the two cases; the only difference is the container.  We can add some text clarifying this point if you think it would be helpful.
Nits/editorial comments:
s/relys/relies ???
Thanks, will fix.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]