Re: [IAOC] Anotherj RFP without IETF community input (was: Re: RFP for Remote Participation Services Specifications Development)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bob,
At 10:50 20-10-2011, Bob Hinden wrote:
The intent of this work is to develop a set of requirements for community review. I don't see any significant value in asking the community for input on an RFP that is for

I would be concerned if a Chair skipped the community step on the presumption that it will not be of significant value. There has been previous discussions about individuals using the IETF affiliations without IESG, IAB or WG approval. These individuals might not have seen any significant value in notifying the relevant body.

Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]