Re: [IAOC] Anotherj RFP without IETF community input (was: Re: RFP for Remote Participation Services Specifications Development)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I don't see any significant value in asking the community for input on
> an RFP that is for hiring someone to write a specification to generate
> community input.

the problem may be that you may lack a sense of humor, an appreciation
of recursion, and a vision for just how twisted ietf process can be
made.

can we please restart the poisson wg so all this can be moved elsewhere?

randy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]