Re: Last Call <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This is not actually correct. The IETF has a very long history of
> pushing back on multiple redundant solutions to the same problem.
> There are a great many cases of ADs, working group chairs, and others
> pushing quite hard to prevent multiple solutions when one would work
> fine.
> 
> In the very many previous cases it was not necessary to write a
> document because the second (or third, or ...) solution was within the
> same standards body, and it was possible to either prevent
> publication, or publish the second solution as informational, or
> publish the second solution with a disclaimer up front saying some
> form of "we recommend this other solution [add normative reference]
> which is the agreed IETF standard".

as ops ad, i had to do that with cops

randy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]