Milo, Actually, I obsoleted 877 with 1356, so 877 should go on the historic list as well! Cheers, Andy On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Milo Medin <medin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Egads! You guys tried to sneak this by me while I was helping my wife > deliver our 4th baby? Have you no shame?? > I would like to point out that the 1822 protocol is 100% AMERICAN in it's > origin - not all this X.* stuff that is partly responsible for the > burgeoning US trade deficit. Did you know that X.25 was developed in the > same year that the fluoridation of our water supply began? Do I really need > to connect the dots together for everyone? > I think RFC 802 should not be deprecated until RFC 877 is also deprecated. > Otherwise we are taking actions that only undercut the competitiveness of > Internet technologies vv their ISO equivalents. What is coming next? Has > CLNP been deprecated by the ISO yet? This is a slippery slope that could > yield all kinds of bad outcomes. > As the takeover of Internet governance by the UN is being debated, this just > adds impetus for them to now argue to try and resurrect CLNP and TP4 and > their follow travelers and impose them on the world by force. We should > never underestimate the threat posed by the OSI suite. It can come back up > like a bad piece of sushi if we are not careful here. > I urge you to reconsider this move. > Thanks! ( :) ) > Milo > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf