NomCom 2011-2012 feedback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear 2011-2012 nominating committee members,

You requested feedback from the IETF community for positions on the IESG, IAB and IAOC. As none of the candidates shared their views about a simple question that was asked on the IETF mailing list, I gather that none of them are reading the mailing list. I am in two minds about whether to provide feedback or not. I'll share with you why the decision is not so easy.

There is this thing called social networks. They provide an important service as they enable little girls to keep us abreast of their state of well-being. You can even click on an "I Like" button to provide input about hotness. It is easier to determine whether the candidates would make an informed decision if they share their views on an IETF mailing list.

I noticed that the term "transparency of the process" only appears in two of the three questionnaires. Is there a reason for the omission?

Regards,
-sm

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]