IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Itojun Service Award Announcement
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-lawrence-sipforum-user-agent-config (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Configuration) to Informational RFC
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Packet mood
- Re: Packet mood
- Re: Packet mood
- Re: Last Call: draft-lawrence-sipforum-user-agent-config (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent Configuration) to Informational RFC
- Re: Packet mood
- Re: Packet mood
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Packet mood
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- NAT Traversal With ICMP Replies
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: stable, continuing meeting mailing list?
- Re: stable, continuing meeting mailing list?
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: stable, continuing meeting mailing list?
- Re: stable, continuing meeting mailing list?
- stable, continuing meeting mailing list?
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: T-shirts?
- OpsDir review of draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-17
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- From: Marco Davids (Prive)
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- RE: T-shirts?
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- RE: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Re: Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- Advance travel info for IETF-78 Maastricht
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist (Mailing Lists and Internationalized Email Addresses) to Experimental RFC
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- RE: T-shirts?
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: T-shirts?
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- T-shirts?
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Last Call: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test (An RPSL Interface Id for Operational Testing) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC
- Registration Operations Mail List
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Federated Authentication Discussion Tonight at 9 PM in Manhattan room
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Audio archives
- Re: On Day Passes..
- 回复:Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re:RE: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- Re: On Day Passes..
- RE: On Day Passes..
- NroffEdit updated with December 2009 boilerplate
- On Day Passes..
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Gentle drumming before plenaries this week...
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC
- Gentle drumming before plenaries this week...
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: [Autoconf] Last Call: draft-ietf-autoconf-adhoc-addr-model (IP Addressing Model in Ad Hoc Networks) to Informational RFC
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto ... -- editorials
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- RE: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Above market hotel room rates
- Above market hotel room rates
- Re: Javascript timer for speakers
- Re: Javascript timer for speakers
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Javascript timer for speakers
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Javascript timer for speakers
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: Bar BoF on Location Coherence Wednesday at 11:30 AM
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- From: DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTLABS)
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Using xml2rfc (was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII)
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Using xml2rfc (was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII)
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- IETF77 Technical Plenary Information
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- RE: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: [77all] No Host for IETF 77
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- RE: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: DHCP retransmission behaviour
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- DHCP retransmission behaviour
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- RE: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- 3D Technology Comes to Military and Security Forces
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- Re: IETF-77 Clouds bar BoF at 11:30 AM on Thursday, 3/25/2010
- IETF-77 Clouds bar BoF at 11:30 AM on Thursday, 3/25/2010
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Wednesday Plenary Preparation
- Data points with screenshots, on specification publishing formats
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- RE: Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: Periodic debates
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Audio Streaming Update 3/21 - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: A state of spin ... presented in ASCII
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- secdir review/last call comments for : draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Regd ospfASBdrRtrStatus
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt
- A state of spin ... presented in ASCII (was: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII)
- Re: Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- ISOC Accepting IETF Fellowship Applications
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Make the Internet uncensorable to intermediate nodes
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Regd ospfASBdrRtrStatus
- Re: Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Make HTML and PDF more prominent, was: Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: IPV6
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Fw: IPV6
- IPV6
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Alfredo Dal´Ava Júnior
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it)
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it)
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it)
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Michael Edward McNeil
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02 (and what time is it)
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- RE: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: HUANG, JERRY (ATTLABS)
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Comments on draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words-03
- Re: Last Call: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test (An RPSL Interface Id for Operational Testing) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- RE: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitionsfor expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Alfredo Dal´Ava Júnior
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-haberman-rpsl-reachable-test (An RPSL Interface Id for Operational Testing) to Proposed Standard
- [IETF] If document formats were radios was:Towards consensus on document format
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: I-Ds are not RFCs, was Why the normative form of IETF Standards
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Bar BoF on Location Coherence Wednesday at 11:30 AM
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Bar BoF on Location Coherence Wednesday at 11:30 AM
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- Re: Last Call: draft-ogud-iana-protocol-maintenance-words (Definitions for expressing standards requirements in IANA registries.) to BCP
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Michael Edward McNeil
- RE: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Michael Edward McNeil
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-09.txt
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Change in ISOC Panel Topic for Tuesday at IETF 77
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Periodic debates
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Review of draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm-09.txt
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-radext-status-server (Use of Status-Server Packets in the Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Protocol) to Informational RFC
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Gen-ART (belated) LC Review of draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-natfw-23
- Re: On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Periodic debates
- Re: Periodic debates
- Periodic debates
- RE: Towards consensus on document format
- RE: Internet wins 2010 Nobel Peace Prize...
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Internet wins 2010 Nobel Peace Prize...
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Towards consensus on document format
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- On the IAB technical advice on the RPKI
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Towards consensus on document format
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Audio Streaming Info - IETF 77 March 21-26, 2010
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- RE: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: What day is 2010-01-02
- What day is 2010-01-02
- Re: Error in Security Considerations in an RFC
- Error in Security Considerations in an RFC
- Retorical question: How do I pay for my registration?
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang (YANG - A data modeling languagefor NETCONF) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- IETF 80 in Prague
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- RE: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]