IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- RE: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Comments on appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- RE: [77attendees] High Assurance Cryptographic API Bar BoF at IETF 77 in Anaheim, CA
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for SNMP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Isms] Last Call: draft-ietf-isms-dtls-tm (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for SNMP) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- RE: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Why the normative form of IETF Standards is ASCII
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Internet Registration Bar BOF Update
- Namespace requirements, was: Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-yang (YANG - A data modeling language for NETCONF) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Appeal Support ... was Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: [Emu] Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Appeal to the IESG concerning the approbation of the IDNA2008 document set.
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- Re: [Emu] Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- Re: [77attendees] High Assurance Cryptographic API Bar BoF at IETF 77 in Anaheim, CA
- Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1)
- High Assurance Cryptographic API Bar BoF at IETF 77 in Anaheim, CA
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Emu] Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- Re: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- RE: Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- Gen-ART LC/Tekechat Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-10
- Bar Bof on Federated Authentication Thursday at 9 PM during IETF week
- comments on draft-maglione-radext-ipv6-acct-extensions-01
- Archiving legacy text files
- Request for input and participation
- Re: No Host for IETF 77 meeting in Anaheim, California
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-13
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
- Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-mailto-bis (The 'mailto' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
- Re: [IPsec] IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
- IETFLC comments for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard
- Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat
- Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat
- Re: REVISED Last Call: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat (Asymmetric Key Packages) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [DNSOP] Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement
- Re: [DNSOP] Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement
- Re: Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement
- Re: Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement
- Internet Registration Bar BOF announcement
- No Host for IETF 77 meeting in Anaheim, California
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Transport Protocol Port Randomization Recommendations) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1)
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization (Part #1)
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- From: William Allen Simpson
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- RE: Patent disclosure in draft-shin-augmented-pake-00.txt
- RE: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The ResourceManagement in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- From: Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-rmd (RMD-QOSM - The Resource Management in Diffserv QOS Model) to Experimental RFC
- Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-06
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Patent disclosure in draft-shin-augmented-pake-00.txt
- PKIgate
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- IETF Workshop on Broadband Home Gateways
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-05.txt
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- From: William Allen Simpson
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- From: William Allen Simpson
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- From: William Allen Simpson
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- From: William Allen Simpson
- ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- From: William Allen Simpson
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Last Call: draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd (EAP Authentication Using Only A Password) to Informational RFC
- RE: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt (The TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt (The TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify (DNS Zone Transfer Protocol (AXFR)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd (EAP Authentication Using Only A Password) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd (EAP Authentication Using Only A Password) to Informational RFC
- Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-considerations
- Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- RE: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- RE: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt (The TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard
- From: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: ietf 1id_guidelines tool broken
- Re: Fwd: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: Fwd: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: Fwd: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT!
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT!
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT!
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: Fwd: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Re: Fwd: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Fwd: [rt.ietf.org #24364] mail.ietf.org. is ietf.org., Remove MX Records For Less Spam
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto ...
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- RE: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced ithas adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto ... -- editorials
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto ...
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: Stub DNSSec Resolution, Or Use DNSScurve
- Re: Stub DNSSec Resolution, Or Use DNSScurve
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- New email address for Independent Submission stream
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT!
- Re: Stub DNSSec Resolution, Or Use DNSScurve
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: Stub DNSSec Resolution, Or Use DNSScurve
- Stub DNSSec Resolution, Or Use DNSScurve
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify (DNS Zone Transfer Protocol (AXFR)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-ecrit-framework
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- RE: [Geopriv] Last Call: draft-ietf-geopriv-prefix (Prefix elements for Road and House Numbers in PIDF-LO) to Informational RFC
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- >1 Day One Day Passes
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation (Cryptographic Algorithm Identifier Allocation for DNSSEC) to Proposed Standard
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS
- Re: LDIF Standard
- Re: LDIF Standard
- Re: LDIF Standard
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-05
- From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- LDIF Standard
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- RE: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- From: Jeff Wheeler (jewheele)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- RE: Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
- Re: document requirements and IETF procedures (was: Re: polishing of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc3597-bis-01)
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Anaheim IETF Codesprint
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- IETF FTP and New RSYNC Option
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-05.txt
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- RE: WG Review: Recharter of IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
- HomeGate Interim Meeting Details
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Re: Roll Over and Die ?
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- The DNSSEC nightmare continues Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- TSV review of draft-ietf-sipping-rtcp-summary-08
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-05.txt
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost [Was: Re: IAB statement on the RPKI. ]
- Re: New IRTF research group on virtual networks (VNRG)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
- Re: Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-05.txt
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Update: Gen-ART LC/TC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-spc-rsvpte-ext-07
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost [Was: Re: IAB statement on the RPKI. ]
- GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
- GenART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-hiding-req-02
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
- Re: File Name, Last Modified time on data url
- New IRTF research group on virtual networks (VNRG)
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-10 LC comments
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- From: Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- From: Phillip Hallam-baker
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Proposed bar BOF on federated authentication for non-web applications at IETF 77
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of IP Security Maintenance and Extensions (ipsecme)
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics-05.txt
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- RE: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- File Name, Last Modified time on data url
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- RE: federated authentication for non-web applications at IETF 77
- Re: federated authentication for non-web applications at IETF 77
- RE: federated authentication for non-web applications at IETF 77
- Call for comments: draft-cooper-privacy-policy
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.
- From: Mr. James W. Laferriere
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- A clarification of what I said (was Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost . . . )
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost (...) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Call for Comments: draft-livingood-woundy-congestion-mgmt-03
- Call for Comments: draft-livingood-web-notification-01
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Last Call for Comments: draft-oreirdan-mody-bot-remediation-06
- Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost (Use of GOST signature algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSEC) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-pana-iana (IANA Rules for Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [rfc-i] Nevil Brownlee as Independent Submissions Editor
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-rmt-flute-revised-10
- RE: secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-05
- From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- IPv6 PMTU blackhole problem at tools/mail.ietf.org
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Fwd: NetFPGA tutorial with IETF in Anaheim
- Re: NetFPGA tutorial with IETF in Anaheim
- NetFPGA Tutorial and ISOC Panel on Virtual Worlds and Gaming
- BOF / New Mailing List E2MD (E.164 To MetaData) DDDS application
- Anaheim IETF Codesprint
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message-01
- NetFPGA tutorial with IETF in Anaheim
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: TSV-DIR review of draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-03
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- IETF Outcomes Wiki
- proposed charter for "NewPrep" WG
- RE: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (TrustAnchor ManagementProtocol(TAMP)) toProposed Standard
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Re: Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- Draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp: Late change of IANA consideration section
- TSV-DIR review of draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-03
- Re: [AFS3-std] Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks (ICMP attacks against TCP) to Informational RFC
- Cloud Computing for DoD and Government Summit
- secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-05
- Gen-ART LC/TC Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-pc-spc-rsvpte-ext-06
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- RE: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System(DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible ProvisioningProtocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for theExtensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (Trust Anchor ManagementProtocol(TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (TrustAnchor ManagementProtocol(TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- Latest IETF Journal available now (Volume 5, Issue 3)
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Chatter
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- RE: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- From: Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- RE: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- RE: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one
- Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
- Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- RE: [TLS] Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiationdetail
- Confirming consensus about one draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation detail
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (Trust Anchor Management Protocol (TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [pkix] Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-tamp (Trust Anchor ManagementProtocol (TAMP)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Not All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: Not All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: All IETF posted email addresses MUST be real.
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Malthus ( was RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?)
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Malthus ( was RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?)
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- RE: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Re: Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Motivation to submit an idea in IETF?
- Internet Registration Escrow
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-duerst-mailto-bis (The 'mailto' URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [iucg] IDNA2008 : planned appeal
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Smart Power Directorate
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0) -- lessons learned?
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- BOF proposals due soon
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [BEHAVE] General Comments on xlate-stateful-07
- Review of draft-jabley-reverse-servers-01
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Upcoming Datatracker User Interface Changes
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: Visas to China
- smartpower-interest@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: IETF 79 overlaps with IEEE 802 plenary in November
- IETF 79 overlaps with IEEE 802 plenary in November
- Re: Smart Power Directorate
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-05
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- ICSI Netalyzr measurement project
- Re: [IAB] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Gregory M. Lebovitz
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Visas to China
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- RE: Visas to China
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: Best way to document a packet protocol?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Best way to document a packet protocol?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: Visas to China
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- AW: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Smart Power Directorate
- Visas to China
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-05
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]