Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-06-20, at 15:52, Geert Jan de Groot wrote:

> IMHO, there's 2 issues:
> 1. Global IPv6 connectivity doesn't exist - at best, it's a tunnel mess
>   with bits and pieces continuously falling off, then getting reconnected
>   again, and nobody seems to care - there's no effort to make connectivity
>   more stable

I think this is an over-statement (at least, if you consider that global IPv4 connectivity *does* exist, which I might choose to argue about over an open pack of Stroopwafels).

> 2. A new client query type - AAAAA - (that's 5 A's, meaning "give me IPv6
>   unless it doesn't exist, in which case return me IPv4),
>   with this result cached, would be helpful in high-latency
>   situations

I haven't run the numbers, but my instinct is that this is a problem worth solving. If a thousand out of every thousand and one queries is answered from the cache, then optimising a thousand and two (AAAA and A) back to a thousand and one isn't going to make a perceptible difference to anybody, at the cost of interop and fallback in a world where AAAAA is not universally available.

It would be good if someone with access to a nice variety of query dumps from resolvers in various situations was able to estimate the practical impact on the end user of optimising (A, AAAA) into (AAAAA -- nice name) since this idea is a good enough one that (plain to see) it keeps coming up. If it has value, let's see the numbers and do something about it. If not, let's put it to bed.


Joe
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]