Phillip, On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > Am I the only person that thinks that if shaving 50ms off HTTP latency is a worthwhile goal it would be more appropriate to look at a DNS based signaling mechanism that is going to support that goal (and also do the right thing for IPv4/6) rather than look at various ways to coax the desired behavior from the legacy infrastructure. How would a DNS-based signaling mechanism work when DNS servers do not necessarily know anything about the state of connectivity to the server they provide name service for? Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf