>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Peter> On 5/19/10 12:36 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've
>> brought up in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph
Peter> I proposed:
Peter> Although the group will seek input from and may provide
Peter> advice to "customers" working on other technologies, it will
Peter> prioritize work on the above-listed stringprep profiles and
Peter> will take on additional tasks as official milestones only
Peter> after rechartering.
I am actually fine with this if you note in the above text that Kerberos
needs to be considered when considering SASLPREP and explicitly add RFC
4282.
What I'm objecting to is prioritizing the list of stringprep profiles
you've identified to other stringprep profiles that came up during the
discussion of the charter.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf