> Sounds like you'll need to be looking up market, you're not really > looking for a soho router at the point where you've got multiple > external providers. Who said anything about multiple external providers? All I'm talking about is support for a small number of static IPs on a single network interface. Like you'd need to run, say, a couple of small scale servers. This is NOT high end in any way, shape, or form. > This device and it's ilk represted the ipv6 functionality availble in a > circa mid to late 2009 home router with a retail price of $100-$150. > They are pretty good devices. In your opinion, perhaps. But 10 years ago I bought a Sonicwall SOHO router with all of the capabilities - except IPv6 support - I'm talking about here. I think it cost around $250. Is it really too much to ask that, 10 years later, for a comparable device with decent IPv6 support added? > If you're comparing them to a sonic wall tz you're not really comparing > the same class of device. by your own admission the later is inadequate > so I'm not sure why you'd even bring it up. The Sonicwall TZ 100 is available for $289. The D-link unit you are fond of lists for around $160, the Airport Extreme for around $179, the Linksys RVS4000 is the cheapie in the group at around $110. Nevertheless, these are hardly in vastly different price classes. But let's assume, for the moment, that they are - that the extra $100-$200 is a really big deal. So what? My point stands - you have yet to identify anything - even an "upscale" box - that meets my stated criteria where "must be dirt cheap" was conspicuous by its absence. Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf