On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:09:53PM -0700, Ted Hardie wrote: > illness forced them to participate remotely. I'd personally rather > we expand "attend" to include remote attendance rather than narrow > it to exclude folks who didn't pay for a whole week. I've already said too much in this thread, but while I might happily agree with any plans to diversify the way we define "attend", we simply cannot do that on anything like a permanent basis without changing the relevant RFC. So we need to separate that issue from the immediate issue of who might qualify for the NomCom _this year_. We need to separate the issues because the latter is an immediate practical concern, and it's really just more important that we have some rule than that we have a perfect one. Please let us not conflate these two matters. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf