Re: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk (Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile Survivability Framework) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2010, at 3:42 PM, "Varma, Eve L (Eve)" <eve.varma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eve.varma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Dear editors,

In reviewing draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk, I noticed that in Section 4.7.4, Triggers for the Linear Protection Switching Action, the next to the last paragraph includes a reference to a solution that is work in progress.  Specifically, see italicized text below –

In order to achieve 50ms protection switching it is recommended to
use in-band data-plane driven signaling protocol to coordinate the
protection states. An in-band data-plane PSC (Protection State
Coordination) protocol is defined in [MPLS-TP-Linear-Protection] for
this purpose. This protocol is also used to detect mismatches
between the configuration provisioned at the ends of the Protection
Domain.

Given draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection is a work in progress – and not a pre-existing protocol, I do not believe it is appropriate to reference it from within the framework document.  Thus, I propose that the italicized sentences be deleted.

With best regards,
Eve





-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx<mailto:mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx> [mailto:mpls-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 3:03 PM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: <mailto:mpls@xxxxxxxx> mpls@xxxxxxxx<mailto:mpls@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk (Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile Survivability Framework) to Informational RFC



The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG

(mpls) to consider the following document:



- 'Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile Survivability

   Framework '

   <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.txt> as an Informational RFC



The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits

final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the

ietf@xxxxxxxx<mailto:ietf@xxxxxxxx> mailing lists by 2010-05-06. Exceptionally,

comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx<mailto:iesg@xxxxxxxx> instead. In either case, please

retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.



The file can be obtained via

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.txt





IESG discussion can be tracked via

https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18472&rfc_flag=0



_______________________________________________

mpls mailing list

mpls@xxxxxxxx<mailto:mpls@xxxxxxxx>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Ietf@xxxxxxxx>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]