Dear Eve, Thanks for your review. I think you are actually right. We cannot say that the protocol
is (already) defined. But we should indicate that such a protocol should be
defined as part of the work on linear protection. We will fix the text accordingly. Best regards, Nurit From:
ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ext
Varma, Eve L (Eve) Dear editors, In reviewing draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk, I noticed that in
Section 4.7.4, Triggers for the Linear Protection Switching Action, the next to
the last paragraph includes a reference to a solution that is work in progress.
Specifically, see italicized text below – In order to achieve 50ms
protection switching it is recommended to use in-band data-plane driven
signaling protocol to coordinate the protection states. An in-band
data-plane PSC (Protection State Coordination) protocol is defined in
[MPLS-TP-Linear-Protection] for this purpose. This protocol is also used to
detect mismatches between the configuration provisioned at
the ends of the Protection Domain. Given draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection
is a work in progress – and not a pre-existing protocol, I do not believe
it is appropriate to reference it from within the framework document.
Thus, I propose that the italicized sentences be deleted. With
best regards, Eve -----Original Message----- The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol
Label Switching WG (mpls) to consider the following document: - 'Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile
Survivability Framework '
<draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.txt> as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks,
and solicits final comments on this action. Please send
substantive comments to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2010-05-06. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either
case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow
automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.txt IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18472&rfc_flag=0 _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf