|
Dear editors, In reviewing
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk, I noticed that in Section 4.7.4, Triggers for
the Linear Protection Switching Action, the next to the last paragraph includes
a reference to a solution that is work in progress. Specifically, see
italicized text below – In
order to achieve 50ms protection switching it is recommended to use
in-band data-plane driven signaling protocol to coordinate the protection
states. An in-band data-plane PSC ( Coordination)
protocol is defined in [MPLS-TP-Linear-Protection] for this purpose.
This protocol is also used to detect mismatches between the
configuration provisioned at the ends of the Protection Domain. Given draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection
is a work in progress – and not a pre-existing protocol, I do not believe
it is appropriate to reference it from within the framework document.
Thus, I propose that the italicized sentences be deleted. With best regards, Eve -----Original Message----- The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching
WG (mpls) to consider the following document: - 'Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile Survivability Framework ' <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.txt> as an
Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments
to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2010-05-06. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-survive-fwk-05.txt IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18472&rfc_flag=0 _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls |
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf