On Mon, 10 May 2010, Dave CROCKER wrote: > On 5/10/2010 11:08 AM, David Morris wrote: > > On Mon, 10 May 2010, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > Given that the argument for /ex/clusiveness pertains to competence at > > > rendering judgment about IETF leadership candidates, can you explain why > > > lowering the bar helps produce better leadership selection? > > > > Because from my own experience, I've demonstrated the bar has minimal > > correlation with the reality of exposure to the IETF. > > > > Secondly, I don't see this as lowering anything but a financial bar. For > > an open organization, minimizing the bars to participation is actually > > a better approach. > > > How does this trend at reducing the requirement for participation lead > anywhere but to eventually saying that anyone may volunteer, without any > regard for IETF experience? All I'm really trying to highlight is that the current bar is an essentially meaningless measure. If participation should be measured, and I think it should, a better measure should be defined by some future WG activity. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf