On 06/09/2010 01:19 PM, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > And so, having no other argument to make, we resort to pejoratives? > Calling small business use of a small number of IPv4 addresses > "anachronistic" > doesn't change the fact that this is a widespread practice fully > supported by > an ample number of reasonable quality router products. And you're not > going to > get IPv6 deployed in such cases without a drop-in replacement that adds > IPv6 > support to what's already there. this is cute ned but your assertion that this device can't route for a interior public prefix was just plain wrong. perhaps you should actually get one and try it? > Ned > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf