Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jun 20, 2010, at 10:36 AM, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I said that right now
> it's extremely ill-advised to ship products that have IPv6 support enabled by
> default. This is one of the many reasons for this.

I would argue the opposite; people won't turn it on otherwise, due to lack of knowledge or negligence. What I would also argue is that the API that opens a session should try all available address pairs in relatively short order - on the order of tens of milliseconds between new attempts - keeping in some scratchpad memory notes on what worked, and trying those first on a subsequent access to the same name. If IPv4 addresses are what work, so be it. 

Happy Eyeballs...
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]