Re: Last Call: Policy Statement on the Day Pass Experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Doug,

I had also wished for numbers that more clearly translated into impact on who was NomCom eligible (as you requested), but decided not to, simply because I wasn't convinced this would matter enough on who was selected to serve on NomCom, to justifiy spending secretariat time gathering the information.

Now that the IESG has changed their proposed policy statement so that people who MIGHT have purchased a day pass thinking that this counted as "attending" for NomCom purposes, I am OK with not knowing these numbers, and I believe that the IESG is interpreting 3777 in a way that is not unreasonable.

Thanks,

Spencer


These are the number of day passes that were purchased for the meeting
listed.

Russ

On 5/14/2010 6:32 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 5/14/2010 3:23 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Day Pass History:
   Hiroshima: 121
   Anaheim: 135

Thanks Russ (and Ray). However it's not clear to me if those numbers
represent the total number of day pass participants (which they seem to)
or if those numbers are an answer to the question I posed below.

Would it be possible to get a number from the secretariat of those who
have paid full freight for 2 of the last 5 meetings, plus used a day
pass for one or more of the other 3?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]