I'm not sure it's relevant directly for this document, but it would be
great if this could be fixed anyway in the upcomming work on the tracker:
It has occasionally happened to me that I forgot to update a draft
before the 6-month deadline. The system then sends a nice mail saying
that a new draft is overdue, but in terms of states, the draft moves to
"Dead", and even if a new draft is submitted a day or two after the old
one expired, the new one also is labeled as "Dead", and as far as I
remember, it was near impossible to get it out of that state. A draft
that's a few days old and "Dead" really looks strange :-(.
Regards, Martin.
On 2010/06/10 0:09, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Definition of IETF Working Group Document States '
<draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07.txt> as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2010-07-07. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-07.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19480&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
--
#-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf