Re: Last Call: Policy Statement on the Day Pass Experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>>>>> "todd" == todd glassey <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    todd> Doesnt then also attending a meeting through a video
    todd> conference including streaming also qualify? Seems to me both
    todd> are reasonable methods of attending these days.

I also agree that we should diversify the meaning of attendance.
My preference has been essentially:
   - that to initially qualify you need something like 3 out-of-last-5
     *IN-PERSON* (and yes, I would exclude daypass)

   - but that to remain qualified, you need to attend 1 out-of-last-4
     in-person, and (remotely attend 2-out-of-last-5 OR
     author-at-least-3-revisions-of-draft).

The problem with video conferencing is that you don't get to do any of:
    1) chat in hallway
    2) chat at social
    3) be a tourist at something you know nothing about
    4) hang out in bar, and overhear something that matters
    5) overhear heated debate during fight for cookies

While it is possible that you might get up at 2am to attend a video
conference version of a session you don't care about, I doubt it.

And those above things are pretty important --- it's water cooler talk,
and if you haven't experienced it, then you likely don't know what the
social context things are.

While it's true that things can change after you qualify, and video
conferencing won't tell you much about that, my hope is that the
attendance requirement will update you on that.

(I was at about 8 out of 9 meetings from 1995 to 2004, and about 1
meeting/year since 2005, having missed remote attendance completely,
once.  I blame lack of well-endowed employers, combined with a lack of
desire to fly into the US, even though those meetings are generally
cheaper for me than non-NA ones.  Currently struggling with Maastrich
decision) 

- -- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQEVAwUBS+hzp4CLcPvd0N1lAQKXnQf9ENRksJeX+EaPtcXLX8YOj3ynSU9NXyVk
8xHLu+7jSAtQ9aUsTqqWWU2oMHct7SLJ3EfRng3zy1ig2ve8e48WHs5hrhukCLkV
Hrb0XaJYPZIe3JSIqxtghanHHasrRjdOXFr3QEul0M4d1kKKHxmNo8hGiuqdNJ5F
zt+/kb03vN0Dfc16KhHZnin/aYx44dS+facmA8BRSh46JB7uNzc1WpTFdQDe8QR/
o89pqoS3mogL991VbxwRe09FPNux8VXGzJHQvbUN6D1Z+/OW+FGHIPQAdKI2a5jI
UcmzI6weYn1/RLBx8WP79rR7/s9PT1/1LsLgBQar4/Tc+mHuXwa+rA==
=6657
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]