Re: The IPv6 Transitional Preference Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17 Jun 2010, at 13:30, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> On 06/17/2010 01:38 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>> Just in case someone here wants to take sides, have a look at this thread on the IPv6 discussion list at Apple:
>> http://lists.apple.com/archives/ipv6-dev/2010/Jun/msg00000.html
>> (the thread actually goes back earlier than that, but I can't be bothered going looking for it because I can't stand that awful PiperMail interface)
> 
> What I've never understood is why (almost) everyone tries addresses in sequence instead of in parallel.
> 
> Even applications that routinely open two or more concurrent connections to the server first try IPvX, then wait many seconds, then try IPvY. Why not try both in parallel and use whatever address answers first?

It's Apple we're talking about here.  Have a look at this for some nasty surprises:
http://www.fix6.net/archives/2010/03/06/the-strange-behavior-of-apples-mdnsresponder/

Admittedly this is just for DNS, but I think it illustrates the general problem, you can't win, you can't break even, and you can't even quit the game with this one.

Cheers,
Sabahattin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]