IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa vs foo.invalid
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Michael Ramalho (mramalho)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Minutiae, was Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- RE: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- RE: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- Minutiae, was Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- draft-jabley-sink-arpa, was Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers ...
- RE: China blocking Wired?
- Re: China blocking Wired?
- China blocking Wired?
- Re: XML2RFC and 2010?
- XML2RFC and 2010?
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis (Change Process for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- AW: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RFC Editor Transition Announcement
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records (DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTVApplication-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Benjamin M. Schwartz
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-rationale-15
- Re: Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- IETF 82 in Taipei
- Re: Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Fwd: Need volunteer for continued support of xml2rfc
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: reserved names draft, was Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-reverse-servers (Nameservers for IPv4 and IPv6 Reverse Zones) to Proposed Standard
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: [codec] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l3vpn-e2e-rsvp-te-reqts-04
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Spam Filter Y2.1K Bug
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Announcement of the new Trust Legal Provisions (TLP 4.0)
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- RE: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: I-D Action:draft-levine-reserved-names-registry-00.txt
- Defining the existence of non-existent domains
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: What is this with these confirmation messages?
- Re: Unexpected confirmation messages from the IETF
- Unexpected confirmation messages from the IETF
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- What is this with these confirmation messages?
- Re: [New-work] WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband Audio Codec (codec)
- RE: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: separate out SINK and registry, was Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- need advice on reproducing code (Relax NG) from RFC 4287 (The Atom Syndication Format)
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Last Call: draft-jabley-sink-arpa (The Eternal Non-Existence of SINK.ARPA (and other stories)) to BCP
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- need advice on reproducing code (Relax NG) from RFC 4287 (The Atom Syndication Format)
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- RE: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Re: Most bogus news story of the week
- Most bogus news story of the week
- reminder about BOF proposals
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: your posting to IETF main list wrt References
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC
- Responses to IETF LC comments on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-requirements-03)
- Re: draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- RE: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTVApplication-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC
- From: Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- draft-ietf-tls-renegotation: next steps
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-deployment (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Development, Deployment and Operations) to Informational RFC
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: ISOC and W3C Announcement
- RE: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- IETF 81 in Quebec City!
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-pce-monitoring-04.txt
- Re: Creating issues for "Related Active Documents"
- Creating issues for "Related Active Documents"
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-03
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- draft-ietf-smime-cms-rsa-kem-10 LC comments
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec (DVB-IPTV Application-Layer Hybrid FEC Protection) to Informational RFC
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-08.txt
- RE: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security(TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- XML related issues in metalink, was: Last Call: draft-bryan-metalink (The Metalink Download Description Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
- ISOC BoT nominations
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Last Call: draft-gennai-smime-cnipa-pec (Certified Electronic Mail) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- ISOC and W3C Announcement
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-krb-wg-preauth-framework (A Generalized Framework for Kerberos Pre-Authentication) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- IETF Meeting Survey
- Re: Last Call: draft-xli-behave-ivi (The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Last Call: draft-xli-behave-ivi (The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 Coexistence and Transition) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- [NSIS] Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC
- From: Georgios Karagiannis
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- From: IETF Member Dave Aronson
- Corporate email attachment filters and IETF emails
- Re: IUCG IDNA2010 SIG
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- IUCG IDNA2010 SIG
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- Re: Another thoughts on TRANSITIONAL
- Re: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- but ipv6 wasn't dead
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- IUCG IDNA2010 SIG
- From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc
- RE: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- Re: sctp multihoming query
- Re: sctp multihoming query
- RE: Last Call: draft-bryan-http-digest-algorithm-values-update (Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance Digests) to Informational RFC
- sctp multihoming query
- From: Sudhanva Mudigere Narayana Gowda
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: recent change to draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (in IESG)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- recent change to draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (in IESG)
- Re: Last Call: draft-atlas-icmp-unnumbered (Extending ICMP for Interface and Next-hop Identification) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Question about Binary Encapsulation (Context: Packet Headers)
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) toProposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED
- Re: NOT RECOMMENDED
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- RE: NOT RECOMMENDED (was: Re: [TLS] Last Call:draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation)
- NOT RECOMMENDED (was: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- '3GPP QoS Model for Networks Using 3GPP QoS Classes
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) toProposed Standard
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Maximum Packet Size Parameter <M> -- Re: [NSIS] Last Call: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec (QoS NSLP QSPEC Template) to Informational RFC
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- From: David-Sarah Hopwood
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard
- Spotted at an IEEE conference
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-hip-native-api-09
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-pkix-attr-cert-mime-type (Theapplication/pkix-attr-cert Content Type for AttributeCertificates) to Informational RFC
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sasl-gs2-18
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) toProposed Standard
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- RE: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1
- Re: Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1
- Question about BCP79's Section 4a and its Section 4.1
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- Request for comments on proposed changes to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (TLP)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: rfc3848 (ESMTP and LMTP Transmission Types Registration) to Draft Standard
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: [rfc-i] Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: Review of draft-ietf-idnabis-tables
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
- Important: do not publish "draft-iab-streams-headers-boilerplates-08" as is!
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Logging the source port?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Logging the source port?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02
- Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
- secdir review of draft-ietf-6man-overlap-fragment-03
- Re: RFC levels and I-D "levels"
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Gen-Art Review: draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-22.txt
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-klensin-ftp-registry-02
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RE: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- 3932bis approval
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- RE: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: silly legal boilerplate, was Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Regarding RIM's recent IPR disclosures
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RE: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPRrules)
- Please comment on IAOC candidates be appointed by the IESG
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-reschke-rfc2731bis (RFC 2731 is Obsolete) toInformational RFC
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RIM patents using a mime body in a message (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pkix-new-asn1-07
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
- Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
- Re: Last Call: draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns (Multicast DNS) to Informational RFC
- Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
- Re: secdir review of draft-melnikov-imap-keywords-06
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
- Re: Jabber,... at IETF Plenary Discussions (Re: IETF Plenary Discussions)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
- Re: I-D Action:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12.txt
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12
- Question about draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-12 (was: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt)
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis-10.txt
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Review of draft-lha-gssapi-delegate-policy
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Logging the source port?
- Re: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- RE: Fix the Friday attendance bug: make the technical plenary the last IETF session, like it was before
- RE: If you found today's plenary debate on standards track tedious...
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: IETF Plenary Discussions
- Re: Background on IETF 79 Decision
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: FYI: SPDY
- Re: Logging the source port?
- Apply Now to Join the ICANN Board, the Councils of GNSO and ccNSO, and the ALAC
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Logging the source port?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Logging the source port?
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-dusseault-http-patch-15.txt
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]