Hi,
I will provide an example
This draft defines
AsymmetricKeyPackageModuleV1
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9)
smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-asymmetricKeyPkgV1(50) }
RFC 5652 defines
CryptographicMessageSyntax2004
{ iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549)
pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0) cms-2004(24) }
In this case the id-mod-asymmetricKeyPkgV1(50) is not the same as
cms-2004(24) so they are different but how do you know that 50 is not used
by other draft.
Look at Alfred H־nes email. I think that updating the specific registries is
important. I know that they are not maintained by IANA but hopefully someone
is maintain them and need to be notified of these two OIDs allocations.
Thanks
Roni Even
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Turner [mailto:turners@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:37 PM
> To: Roni Even
> Cc: 'General Area Review Team'; ietf@xxxxxxxx; draft-turner-
> asymmetrickeyformat.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-turner-
> asymmetrickeyformat-05
>
> Roni,
>
> Thanks for your review. Comments inline.
>
> spt
>
> Roni Even wrote:
> > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for
> > this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> >
> > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before
> posting a
> > new version of the draft.
> >
> > Document: draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-05
> >
> > Reviewer: Roni Even
> >
> > Review Date: 2010-4-18
> >
> > IESG Telechat date: 2010-4-22
> >
> > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
> I have
> > some nits
> >
> > Nits/editorial comments:
> >
> > 1. In section 7 what you are registering is a media subtype and not
> a
> > media type. The media type is application. So "defines a new media
> type"
> > should be "defines a new media subtype" and "Registration of media
> type"
> > should be "Registration of media subtype".
>
> I'll add this in.
>
> > 2. The document defines new object identifiers like
> > id-ct-KP-aKeyPackage and AsymmetricKeyPackageModuleV1. Where is the
> list of
> > these identifiers kept and how do you update this list in order to
> guarantee
> > the uniqueness of these identifiers.
>
> I got the OIDs for the content types and asn.1 module out of two arcs.
> Both OIDs are unique. Technically, we'd never update an OID. Once
> it's
> registered it's registered. If we need a new OID, then we don't
> necessarily have to go back to the same arc - but I'm sure we could.
> The module OID I got from the SMIME Arc, which is administered by Russ
> Housley and it's been delegated from IANA to SMIME. The other I got
> out
> of a DoD arc. I should add the following the IANA considerations
> sections to make this clear:
>
> This document makes use of object identifiers to identify a CMS content
> and the ASN.1 module found in Appendix A. The CMS content type OID is
> registered in a DoD arc. The ASN.1 module OID is registered in an arc
> delegated by IANA to the SMIME Working Group. No further action by
> IANA
> is necessary for this document or any anticipated updates.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf