Yes ... in fact if you look at early announce mataterial vs. later I believe the 'limit one' was added after I rattled the cage. On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:10 PM, David Morris wrote: > > > > > Multiple-days should be allowed ... it makes no sense to offer day passes > > to folks with just one day to attend but not to those with 2 or even 3. I > > used a day pass this year and didn't participate in a 2nd WG because two > > day passes weren't allowed. > > Did you ask ? > > Regards > Marshall > > > Don't know if I could justify paying the full > > week fee if a Day pass wasn't offered. If I'd been allowed to have 2 day > > passes, I'd have contributed 10x the green dot campaign value. > > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Danny McPherson wrote: > > > > > > > > Figured I'd be the one to kick a thread off on this fascinating topic :-) > > > > > > I like the idea of day passes, it's not just about the cost of the day > > > pass and all it avails, if someone is only coming to the IETF meeting for > > > a day (e.g., they only want a day pass because they have a time > > > constraining day job or actual fiscal constraints), then why should they > > > be required to pay a fee to subsidize meeting costs for the entire week? > > > > > > The work happens on the mailing lists, consensus is judged on the mailing > > > list, and remote participation is encouraged as well. > > > > > > And if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom eligible. > > > > > > -danny > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ietf mailing list > > > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf