Re: On Day Passes..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Multiple-days should be allowed ... it makes no sense to offer day passes 
to folks with just one day to attend but not to those with 2 or even 3. I 
used a day pass this year and didn't participate in a 2nd WG because two
day passes weren't allowed. Don't know if I could justify paying the full 
week fee if a Day pass wasn't offered. If I'd been allowed to have 2 day
passes, I'd have contributed 10x the green dot campaign value.

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Danny McPherson wrote:

> 
> Figured I'd be the one to kick a thread off on this fascinating topic :-)
> 
> I like the idea of day passes, it's not just about the cost of the day pass and all it avails, if someone is only coming to the IETF meeting for a day (e.g., they only want a day pass because they have a time constraining day job or actual fiscal constraints), then why should they be required to pay a fee to subsidize meeting costs for the entire week?  
> 
> The work happens on the mailing lists, consensus is judged on the mailing list, and remote participation is encouraged as well.  
> 
> And if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom eligible.
> 
> -danny
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]