Re:RE: On Day Passes..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree with the necessary of Day Passes.

Haibin 


> I might be talked into agreeing with most of your points, but I am not
> convinced that "if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom
> eligible."
> 
> How about replacing "should certainly" with "may"?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ed  J. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of
> Danny McPherson
> Sent: March-24-10 10:00 PM
> To: The IETF
> Subject: On Day Passes..
> 
> 
> Figured I'd be the one to kick a thread off on this fascinating 
> topic :-)
> 
> I like the idea of day passes, it's not just about the cost of the 
> day pass
> and all it avails, if someone is only coming to the IETF meeting 
> for a day
> (e.g., they only want a day pass because they have a time 
> constraining day
> job or actual fiscal constraints), then why should they be 
> required to pay a
> fee to subsidize meeting costs for the entire week?  
> 
> The work happens on the mailing lists, consensus is judged on the 
> mailinglist, and remote participation is encouraged as well.  
> 
> And if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom eligible.
> 
> -danny
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]