Re: On Day Passes..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:10 PM, David Morris wrote:


Multiple-days should be allowed ... it makes no sense to offer day passes to folks with just one day to attend but not to those with 2 or even 3. I used a day pass this year and didn't participate in a 2nd WG because two
day passes weren't allowed.

Did you ask ?

Regards
Marshall

Don't know if I could justify paying the full
week fee if a Day pass wasn't offered. If I'd been allowed to have 2 day
passes, I'd have contributed 10x the green dot campaign value.

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Danny McPherson wrote:


Figured I'd be the one to kick a thread off on this fascinating topic :-)

I like the idea of day passes, it's not just about the cost of the day pass and all it avails, if someone is only coming to the IETF meeting for a day (e.g., they only want a day pass because they have a time constraining day job or actual fiscal constraints), then why should they be required to pay a fee to subsidize meeting costs for the entire week?

The work happens on the mailing lists, consensus is judged on the mailing list, and remote participation is encouraged as well.

And if you buy a day pass, you should certainly be nomcom eligible.

-danny
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]